One of the problems that comes up a lot during any campaign season is the way politicians and political parties tend to group clusters of issues, not realizing that the issues aren't necessarily all that related. For example, you can be pro-life and an environmentalist, there is no ideological contradiction there. And many people are. But if only one party supports pro-life positions and the other party supports environmentalist policies, which way are these folks going to go? Or are they just going to stay home?
I am sure there are a lot of people out there like you who are pro-life and not pro-creationism. Similarly, it is possible (though I have never met anyone like this) that a person can be pro-creationism and also an environmentalist.
Back in the day, there was this image that people who cared about the environment were hippies who smoked pot, practiced free love, and didn't believe in any particular god. It is time for us to move on from that out-dated mindset and recognize the true diversity of the political environment in our country.
no subject
I am sure there are a lot of people out there like you who are pro-life and not pro-creationism. Similarly, it is possible (though I have never met anyone like this) that a person can be pro-creationism and also an environmentalist.
Back in the day, there was this image that people who cared about the environment were hippies who smoked pot, practiced free love, and didn't believe in any particular god. It is time for us to move on from that out-dated mindset and recognize the true diversity of the political environment in our country.